Reserved Matters application for the development of 160 dwellings together with access roads, footpaths, drainage, associated car/bicycle parking provision, groundworks, landscaping, open space and infrastructure (pursuant to outline approval 11/00405/AS)
Decided: Approve Details (Reserved Matters)
Download South Ashford Community Forum’s comments on this application.
Original application
11/00405/ASÂ Demolition of existing buildings and construction of up to 241 dwellings and associated access and landscaping; posted on 10 December 2016
Amendments
| Case Ref | Amendment | Posted on |
| 17/00354/AMND/AS | Relocation of block A apartments to avoid mains sewer. Rationalization of building storey height for block A. | 1 Nov 2017 |
| 17/00354/AM01/AS | Rationalisation of build heights to blocks B, C, D to construction methodology of block A. Changes to the car parking layout and change to Section 38 agreement drawing. Introduction of stepped access to plots 63, 64 and 144-154 facing Jemmet Road. Amendement to roof profiles for plots 63, 66 and 131 | 23 March 2018 |
| 17/00354/AM02/AS | Alterations to house types 3C and 5 and proposed car barns, relocated of one parking space on planning permission 17/00354/AS for the Reserved Matters application for the development of 160 dwellings together with access roads, footpaths, drainage, associated car/bicycle parking provision, groundworks, landscaping, open space and infrastructure (pursuant to outline approval 11/00405/AS) | 21 May 2018 |
.
Hi,
Given the South Ashford Community Forum response which puts forwards a number of complaints regarding this development, how is the forum going to convey this to the council members within the democratic process? Further, will this be discussed at the public meeting next week on the 17th of May AT 7pm in the civic center?
With very kind regards
John Stone
The comments we have made have been submitted to the Council for consideration, however, we have asked to address the Planning Committee on Wednesday and will reiterate those comments.
Do be aware that members of the public and community organisations can take no part in the debate. It is normal for a planning officer to respond to issues raised by members of the public but then it is the committee members who select the issues they wish to discuss.
Our comments include issues relating to traffic and parking. We are aware that the outline application included a transport assessment that concluded that the development would not have a negative impact and has been permitted on that basis. ABC may be unable to reject the application on grounds related to traffic and parking or apply any further conditions related to them.
Amended to reflect decision